The recent transport strike staged by PISTON and Manibela on September 23 highlights the ongoing conflict between the government's Public Transport Modernization Program (PTMP) and the concerns of traditional jeepney drivers and operators. This strike, while downplayed by the government, underscores the deep-seated anxieties and frustrations within the transport sector.
The Drivers' Perspective:
The strike was a direct response to the perceived shortcomings of the PTMP. PISTON and Manibela argue that the program's implementation has failed to deliver on its promises, leaving many drivers facing financial hardship and uncertainty. Ruben “Bong” Baylon, PISTON's deputy secretary general, succinctly summarized the drivers' concerns: "We have a simple request. For us to go back to our livelihood. We want to retain single proprietorship, to allow individual operators."
The drivers' anxieties are further amplified by the experiences of operators like Maria Dipus, who, despite modernizing their vehicles three years ago, have yet to see any tangible benefits from the program. "We modernized three years ago, but we have not received any of the benefits, only the cooperative has rights," she lamented. This sentiment echoes the widespread belief that the PTMP prioritizes the interests of cooperatives over individual operators, leaving many drivers feeling marginalized and forgotten.
The Government's Position:
The Department of Transportation (DOTr), however, maintains that the PTMP is essential for improving public transport and reducing pollution. They argue that the program is on track, with 83% of the transportation sector already participating. "Eighty-three percent of the transporation sector has joined the program and that is enough to meet commuters' needs," stated DOTr Undersecretary Jesus Ferdinand Ortega.
The government also downplayed the impact of the strike, claiming that commuters were not significantly affected and that free rides were provided. LTFRB chairperson Teofilo Guadiz III dismissed photos of commuters struggling to find transportation as simply "regular traffic scenes."
The Dilemma of Modernization:
The PTMP, while aiming to modernize public transport and improve efficiency, faces significant challenges in balancing progress with the livelihoods of traditional jeepney drivers. The high cost of modernizing vehicles, coupled with the perceived lack of benefits for individual operators, has fueled resentment and resistance within the transport sector. The government's insistence on consolidating franchises into cooperatives further exacerbates these concerns, as many drivers fear losing their autonomy and control over their businesses.
A Call for Dialogue and Solutions:
The ongoing conflict between the government and transport groups highlights the need for a more inclusive and collaborative approach to implementing the PTMP. Addressing the concerns of individual drivers and operators is crucial to ensure the program's success. This requires open dialogue, transparent communication, and a willingness to consider alternative solutions that address the needs of all stakeholders.
The recent strike serves as a stark reminder that the PTMP is not merely a technical exercise but a complex social and economic issue. Finding a solution that balances modernization with the livelihoods of those who rely on public transport is a critical challenge that requires a commitment to dialogue, understanding, and compromise.
